Development and Use of Nematode-Resistant Varieties

Rev 10/04/07

Definitions: 

Note the effect of vertical resistance on selection for aggressiveness on potatoes in Europe, tobacco in NC, soybean cyst nematode in the southeastern US. Will this happen with the Mi gene in tomato?
Consider the potential for stabilizing selection and management of population gene frequencies since genes for aggressiveness may not confer advantage in absence of selection pressure.

This is an important area in pest and nematode management.
- How is the resistance expressed relative to the nematodes?

Availability of Resistance 

  
Specialization Host Range Resistance
sedentary ********** ** ********
endoparasites ******** ** ******
****** **** ***
**** ****** **
migratory **** ****** **
endoparasites **** ******* **
**** ******** **
ectoparasites **** ********** **

Concept by Roberts (1982).  But how much have we looked for resistance to different types of nematodes, especially when there are no obvious signs or symptoms?
- also, how much of a problem are nematodes in each category?

Expression of Resistance:

a. Resistance to penetration
b. Resistance to development
c. Resistance to productivity (reproduction)

Mechanisms of Resistance:

A very complete understanding of resistance mechanisms is being developed through the work of  Dr. Valerie Williamson and colleagues.  They study the Mi gene which confers resistance to Meloidogyne spp. in tomato.  The gene provides resistance to Meloidogyne incognita, M. arenaria, and M. javanica.  It also confers resistance to the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae, and the white fly Bemisia tabaci.

 

References:

Roberts, P.A.  1982.  Plant resistance in nematode pest management.  Journal of Nematology 14:24-33.

Kaplan, D.T. and E.L. Davis 1987.  Mechanisms of pant incompatibility with nematodes.  Pp 267-276 in: J.A. Veech and D.W. Dickson (eds).  Vistas on Nematology.  E.O Painter, Florida.

Return to Management Menu