Chemical Methods of Nematode Management
Rev
10/10/07
- costs and economics; use restricted primarily to higher value crops in cash economy.
-
phytotoxicity; may only be available for preplant
use.
-
lack of specificity; disruption of the soil food web,
including antagonists, competitors and beneficials.
-
residue problems; soil, groundwater, food - Prop 65
and other legislation.
- non-visible target; volumes of soil are treated rather than
foci of infestation; saturation rather than precision application.
- movement and persistence; chemical may have to permeate the
soil from the site of application in order to contact target nematodes, and
be sufficiently persistent to achieve lethal concentrations at each site.
- dissipation; after lethal dose has been delivered, chemical
should break down or otherwise dissipate in the environment to allow plant
growth and soil food web recovery.
- amounts and technology for application; volume of soil to be
treated requires transportation, handling and application of large volumes
of toxic materials.
Older equipment introduced fumigants to appropriate soil depths but was not
well-engineered for ensuring transfer to and from the delivery tank without
escape to the atmosphere or human exposure.
-
human toxicity; health hazards and risks associated
with volatility, manufacture, handling, application and accidents;
materials may have high mammalian toxicity and/or be suspected carcinogens..
There are two main categories of chemical nematicides based on their
volatility - non-fumigants and fumigants.
- Fumigant nematicides disperse through the soil as a result of their
volatility.
- Non-fumigant nematicides must be mechanically mixed throughout the soil
profile, or spread in aqueous solution.
Two main groups of chemicals, carbamates and organophosphates, and some
alternative materials.
1. Carbamates:
-
O
all have O-C-NH-CH3 group
- applied to soil in water or incorporated
Examples:
| Temik |
Manufacturer: Rhone-Poulenc |
| (aldicarb) |
Introduced: 1965 |
- contact and systemic nematicide, insecticide, acaricide
- granular formulation
- Category I pesticide
- under EPA review - groundwater contamination
|
|
| Furadan |
Manufacturer: Mobay |
| (carbofuran) |
Introduced: 1969 |
- contact and systemic nematicide, insecticide
- granular and liquid formulations
- Category I pesticide
- under EPA review - bird toxicity
- EPA Administrative Review, August 2006.
|
| Vydate |
Manufacturer: Dupont |
| (oxamyl) |
Introduced: 1972 |
|
|
| Standak |
Manufacturer: Rhone-Poulenc |
| (aldoxycarb) |
Introduced: 1976 |
|
|
2. Organophosphates:
- all contain P and S groups
- applied to soil in water or incorporated.
| Dasanit (Considered not profitable to re-register in
California) |
Manufacturer: Mobay |
| (fensulfothion) |
Introduced: 1957 |
|
|
| Mocap |
Manufacturer: Rhone-Poulenc |
| (ethoprop) |
Introduced: 1963 |
|
|
| Nemacur |
Manufacturer: Bayer |
| (phenamiphos, fenamiphos) |
Introduced: 1969. |
- contact and systemic nematicide, insecticide
- granular (10G and 15G) and liquid (Nemacur 3) formulations.
The Nemacur 3 formulation is used in tree and vine plantings in
California.
- Category I pesticide
- Active ingredient (35%): Ethyl 3-methyl-4-(methylthio)phenyl-(1-methylethyl)phosphoramidate
|
Paraphrased from Associated Press (Sacramento Bee,
Dec 17, 2000):
A pesticide that Sonoma County officials believe killed
some 400 birds last month has been banned from farms and vineyards.
The Sonoma County agricultural commissioner is refusing
new applications to use Nemacur after birds were found dead near a
Geyserville vineyard.
.............there may have been a leaking pipe when the
chemical was applied in a vineyard....birds drank from contaminated water.
County agricultural officials said there probably won't
be any widespread impact because the season when it is usually used in
vineyards has passed.
Nemacur has been linked to bird kills in the past
according to the US EPA.
|
|
Phenamiphos is reported to become less
effective when applied repeatedly to soils, possibly due to selection for
organisms that degrade it more rapidly (Davis, et al., 1993; Johnson,
1998).
|
|
In consideration of the cost of obtaining additional safety data requested
by the USEPA, Bayer Crop Sciences elected to voluntarily withdraw the
registration of Nemacur in the USA effective May 31, 2007.
Revised labels have
been submitted to USEPA to implement risk mitigation measures.
Registrations are altered as follows:
- all use and prohibited on vulnerable soils after May 31, 2005;
- production capped at 500,000 pounds in the United States for the
year ending May 31, 2003; and
- production capped for each subsequent year at 20% of the previous
year's production during the 5-year phase out period.
As of May 31, 2007, all sale and distribution by Bayer, the sole
registrant, of existing stocks (manufacturing-use and end-use products),
shall be prohibited in the USA. Persons other than the registrant may sell and
distribute such products until May 31, 2008. Use of stocks in the channels
of trade may continue until depleted, except where prohibited by the
label. Any distribution, sale, or use of existing stocks after the
effective date of the cancellation order that the Agency intends to issue
that is not consistent with the terms of that order will be considered a
violation of section 2(a)(2)(K) and/or 12(a)(1)(A) of FIFRA.
Manufacture, sale, distribution and usage of Nemacur continues in the
rest of the world.
|
3. Others:
| ClandoSan (Pending??) |
Manufacturer: I-gene |
| (chitin+urea) |
Introduced: 1985?? |
- enhances chitinolytic fungi
- granular formulation
|
| DiTera |
Manufacturer: Abbott Labs. Now by Valent Biosciences
|
| (fungal metabolite) |
Introduced: 1996?? |
- antibiotic
- liquid formulation
- DiTera ES is a liquid formulation.
- DiTera G and DiTera WDG are granular formulations.
- Good mammalian and non-target toxicity characteristics.
- DiTera WDG is listed by the Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI)
for use in organic production
|
Two main groups of chemicals, halogenated hydrocarbons and methyl
isothiocyanate liberators.
1. Halogenated hydrocarbons:
- contain Br or Cl groups, e.g., CH3Br
- injected into soil or applied at surface.
| Chlor-O-Pic |
Manufacturer: Great Lakes, Arvesta, others |
| (96.5% - 99% chloropicrin) (CCl3NO2). |
Introduced: 1908 |
|
|
First tested as a preplant soil fumigant in 1920. Chloropicrin (molecular
weight 164.4) is a small, single-carbon molecule that diffuses rapidly
through soil. It is a clear, colorless, nonflammable liquid with a
moderate vapor pressure (18.3 mmHg at 68oF) and boiling point
(234oF). Chloropicrin is a strong lacrimator and therefore an
irritant if it escapes from the soil. Chloropicrin is injected as a
liquid 6-10 inches below the soil surface, 14 days or more before
crop planting.
Released to the atmosphere it photodegrades (half-life 20 days) to
phosgene and nitrosyl chloride.
|
| Meth-O-Gas |
Manufacturer: Great Lakes |
| (100% methyl bromide) |
Introduced: 1932 |
|
|
|
| Brom-O-Gas |
Manufacturer: Great Lakes |
| (98.6% methyl bromide, 1.4% chloropicrin) |
Introduced: |
|
|

 |

Tarped strawberry fields, Santa Barbara County, 2002 |
| Terr-O-Gas |
Manufacturer: Great Lakes |
| (33-100% methyl bromide, 67-0% chloropicrin) |
Introduced: |
|
|
Phase-out of Methyl Bromide
The Montreal Protocol required a 25% decrease in use of methyl bromide
between 1991 and 1999. That goal was met by 1998 in California but
there was a slight increase in 1999. In 2001, usage is required to
drop to 50% of 1991 levels. The price of methyl bromide more than
doubled between 1997 and 2000.
By 2003, methyl bromide production/import must drop to 30% of the 1991
baseline. The pesticide is to be completely phased out by 2005.
The phase-out of methyl bromide is based on purported damage to the
earth's ozone layer by bromine and chlorine
interacting with elevated temperature.
About 93% of methyl bromide use in California is for preplant soil
fumigation:
| Commodity |
Percent Usage |
lbs., 1999 |
acres, 1999 |
| strawberries |
33% |
5,650,000 |
26,937 |
| annual fruits and vegetables |
19% |
2,307,548 |
13,657 |
| grapes |
12% |
1,602,363 |
4,738 |
| fruit and nut trees |
19% |
2,334,960 |
9,362 |
| nursery crops |
12% |
1,582,686 |
5,243 |
| cut flowers |
4% |
407,251 |
1,501 |
|
| Telone II |
Manufacturer: Dow |
| (1,3-dichloropropene) |
Introduced: 1956 |
- soil fumigant
- liquid formulation
- phytotoxic
- Category I pesticide
- application restrictions in California, limited amounts per region
- Telone EC is the drip irrigation
formulation of Telone II.
|
Cabbage plants grown in plot fumigated with Telone
(right), unfumigated (left).
|
| Telone C-17 |
Manufacturer: Dow |
| (73% 1,3-dichloropropene, 17% chloropicrin) |
Introduced: 1956 |
- soil fumigant
- liquid formulation
- phytotoxic
- Category I pesticide
- Telone C17 (17% chloropicrin) is still available in some states, but
not in CA.
- When the grower is in a situation that calls for 1,3-D plus
chloropicrin in a high value crop, it is generally better to use
Telone
C-35 which has more chloropicrin than could be delivered with Telone
C-17. However, chloropicrin is an expensive component. There are
certain markets where the C-17 formulation is more affordable, for
example, pink root control in onions in the Pacific Northwest.
Information from Jim Mueller (2001), Dow AgroSciences |
| Telone C-35 |
Manufacturer: Dow |
| (65% 1,3-dichloropropene, 35% chloropicrin) |
|
- soil fumigant
- liquid formulation
- phytotoxic
- Category I pesticide
- Telone C-35 contains 35% chloropicrin. The chloropicrin provides a
greater level of fungicide activity.
- This is the product now available in CA.
- When the grower is in a situation that calls for 1,3-D plus
chloropicrin in a high value crop, it is generally better to use more
chloropicrin than could be delivered with Telone C-17. However,
chloropicrin is an expensive component. There are certain markets where
the C-17 formulation is more affordable, for example, pink root control
in onions in the Pacific Northwest.
- Chloropicrin content is limited to 35% due to product stewardship
and reactive chemical concerns. Testing indicates that, at
concentrations above about 45% chloropicrin, the mixture becomes
shock-sensitive, and under extreme impact situations, could detonate.
Custom applicators still have the option of increasing the
chloropicrin/1,3-D ratio by using a dual injection system on the field
applicator. The mixing then occurs in the soil. Some custom applicators
now offer this option.
- There are application restrictions in California, limited amounts
may be applied per region.
- InLine is the drip irrigation formulation of
Telone C-35.
Information from Jim Mueller (2001), DowAgrosciences. |
Other Formulations of Telone:
|
|
Telone EC |
Emulsifiable concentrate form of Telone II for drip irrigation application
through surface or buried drip tape. Area must be tarped for 14 days
after application (see news release below and
product label). |
|
InLine |
Drip irrigation formulation of Telone C35. Application is through
surface or buried drip tape. Area must be tarped for 14 days after
application (see news release below and
product label). |
| Telone Usage in California, 1999: |
| Commodity |
Percent Usage |
lbs., 1999 |
acres, 1999 |
| perennial trees and vines |
30% |
896,196 |
3,148 |
| annual fruits and vegetables |
66% |
1,985,398 |
21,999 |
| field crops |
2% |
57,457 |
794 |
| nursery/ornamentals |
3% |
83,095 |
305 |
News Release from Jim Mueller (DowAgrosciences),
May 2001
- Subject Telone EC and InLine registered
- Date Fri, 11 May 2001 175840 -0400
-
- US-EPA has approved the registrations of
Telone
EC and InLine Soil Fumigants
- for drip irrigation application.
- These are the drip application counterparts for
the tractor-injected
- formulations, Telone II and
Telone C35.
-
- The Federal labels are attached. Here are some
significant details
- 1. Telone EC and InLine may be applied through
surface or buried drip tape.
- 2. The current labels cover vegetable crops,
field crops, strawberries and
- pineapples. Other crops will be added, based on
the outcome of efficacy
- research. In the mean time, its relatively easy
to get permits for testing
- on other crops.
- 3. Under the current labels, a plastic tarp seal
is mandatory for at least
- 14 days after all applications of these
products. The tarp requirement may
- change in the future. Virtually impermeable film
(VIF) is not required on
- the Federal label.
- 4. The Federal label specifies a 100 foot buffer
zone between the treated
- area and occupied structures.
- 5. CA-specific The labels are being reviewed by
CDPR, and we expect
- approval in CA soon. The current CA permit
conditions require a 300 foot
- buffer zone, and the use of VIF. Until the
Federal label is approved by CA,
- an experimental use permit will continue to
allow extensive commercial use
- of InLine in CA.
-
- Its risky to list names, because some key
researchers might be overlooked.
- However, the earliest pioneers of this
application concept, in the late 80's
- and early 90's, were John Radewald, Becky
Westerdahl, Mike McKenry, Brent
- Sipes and John Darsow. Key contributions were
made later by many, including Ole Becker, Tom Trout, Husein Ajwa, John Duniway,
Steve Wilhelm, Christopher Winterbottom, Frank Sances and others.
- To these scientists, and to all of the others
who made this innovation a
- reality thanks for the excellent research, and
for persevering through the
- times of regulatory uncertainty. You should feel
a sense of accomplishment,
- as you see the results of your work now being
implemented by growers
- throughout the U.S.
Jim Mueller |
Township Restrictions on Use of Telone in California
- On January 28, 2002 the California Department of Pesticide
Regulation announced a restructuring of the use management plan for
Telone Products.
- The refinements will maintain existing protection of public health,
while making these key products available to more growers, and will
assist growers in their transition away from methyl bromide.
- Permit conditions for the use of products containing 1,3-D currently
allow the application of a maximum of 90,250 adjusted pounds of 1,3-D
per township per year. Adjustments to the applied amount are based on
the application method used and the 1,3-D content of the product. For
example, when Telone II is applied at a depth of 18 inches and followed
by a disk and roller, each gallon applied counts as 1 gallon (10 pounds)
toward the township cap.
- When InLine or Telone EC are applied through drip irrigation under
standard plastic film, each pound of 1,3-D applied counts as 1.16 pounds
towards the township cap.
- For the next several years, use will be allowed above the cap in
townships where use since 1995 has been significantly under the amount
allowed by the cap. This increase is limited to 180,500 adjusted pounds
of 1,3-D per township per year. Due to the limited use of 1,3-D since
1995, most townships will have access to 180,500 adjusted pounds of
1,3-D per year.
- CDPR and Dow AgroSciences both recognize that this refinement is
part of a short-term solution to the township cap issue. We will
continue to work with CDPR on further refinements, such as regional or
area-specific township caps.
- I will continue to keep you informed of regulatory progress with
Telone Products.
Jim Mueller
|
2. Methyl isothiocyanate liberators:
- contain CH3-N=C=S group
- applied in water or injected.
| Vapam / Soilprep/Metam-Sodium |
Manufacturer: Stauffer |
| (sodium methyl dithiocarbamate) |
Introduced: 1954 |
|
|
| Metam-Sodium Usage in California,
1999: |
| Commodity |
Percent Usage |
lbs., 1999 |
acres, 1999 |
| perennial trees and vines |
0.5% |
65,367 |
354 |
| annual fruits and vegetables |
92.5% |
15,794,398 |
160,987 |
| field crops |
5% |
883,120 |
18,980 |
| nursery/ornamentals |
2% |
334,316 |
1,376 |
| Vorlex |
Manufacturer: Nor-Am |
| (40% 1,3 dichloropropene, 20% methyl isothiocyanate) |
Introduced: 1959 |
|
|
3. Others:
| Enzone (GY-81) |
Manufacturer: Union Oil? |
| sodium tetrathiocarbonate (carbon disulfide liberator) |
Introduced: 1978 |
|
|
Developmental History:
- CS2 used as a soil fumigant in 19th century, but
explosive
- 1978 GY-81 formulation developed by UnoCal
- 1978 greenhouse tests
- 1980 first field trials
- 1984 experimental use permit with crop destruction
- 1987 and 1989 EUP (Experimental Use Permit) without
requirement for crop destruction for 4000 acres
- 1988 groundwater studies completed
- 1990 $15 million development costs to date
- 1995?? California registration
Characteristics (according to manufacturer):
- no heavy elements
- no residues
- short-lived in soil
- post-plant usage (not phytotoxic)
- high mobility in soil, not influenced by soil texture
- low groundwater contamination potential
- low mammalian toxicity
|
______________________________________________________________________________
Toxicity Categories of Pesticides and Signal Indicators:
| Category |
Signal |
Mammalian Toxicity |
Oral LD50 (mg/kg) |
Dermal LD50
(mg/kg) |
Inhalation LC50
(mg/L) |
| I |
- Danger
- Poison
- Skull
|
High |
0-50 |
0-200 |
0-2000 |
| II |
Warning |
Moderate |
51-500 |
201-2,000 |
2,001-20,000 |
| III |
Caution |
Low |
>500 |
>2,000 |
>20,000 |
______________________________________________
Back to Top
1. For all nematicides, consider properties relative to movement in
soil:
- water solubility
- vapor pressure, volatility, fumigant action
- Henry's constant (kH) - affinity for water
- method of incorporation or movement in soil
2. Nematicides in soil are in dynamic equilibrium among the three soil
phases: 1) solids (adsorbed to clay and OM), 2) soil solution, and 3)
soil air.
- Non-fumigants are mainly distributed in phases 1 and 2, movement IS by mass
flow.
-
Fumigant movement determined by vapor pressure and kH, move 1000x faster in
air than in water.
- Fumigant movement is affected by low and high soil temperatures,
low and high soil moisture, clay or silt content, organic matter
content; e.g., problems with 1,3-D efficacy in the Tulelake
region were attributed to the narrow temperature and
moisture window prior to potato planting, and high adsorption
in highly organic soils.
- Consider the principle of attempting to deliver a standard dosage to the
target (standard concentration*time product; e.g, 50 ppm for 4 days and 100
ppm for 2 days both give a dosage of 200 ppm-day) (McKenry and
Thomason).
| Nemagon, DBCP |
Manufacturers: Shell, Dow, Occidental Petroleum |
(1,2-Dibromo-3-
chloropropane) |
Introduced: 1954 |
- soil fumigant
- liquid formulation
- moved with water in soil
- non-phytotoxic
-
- groundwater contamination
- male sterility
- registration cancelled 1977
|
Billboard along California Hwy 99, 1970s
|
- The chemical formula for DBCP is C3H5Br2Cl,
and the molecular weight is 236.36 g/mol.
- DBCP occurs as a colorless liquid when pure, and commercial grades
as a dark-amber to dark-brown liquid that is slightly soluble in water.
- DBCP has a pungent odor with an odor threshold of 0.3 mg/m3.
- The vapor pressure for DBCP is 0.8 mm Hg at 21 °C, and its log
octanol/water partition coefficient (log Kow) is 2.43.
Until 1977, DBCP was used as a soil fumigant
and nematicide on over 40 different crops in the United States.
A high incidence of male sterility
was reported among workers at the Occidental Petroleum plant in Lathrop,
CA, where DBCP was manufactured, in early 1977. Additional, and
presumably confirmatory, studies were conducted at DBCP-manufacturing
plants of Dow and/or Shell in Texas. From 1977 to 1979, EPA
suspended registration for all DBCP-containing products except for use on
pineapples in Hawaii. In 1985, EPA issued an intent to cancel all
registrations for DBCP, including use on pineapples. Subsequently, the
use of existing stocks of DBCP was prohibited. Acute (short-term)
exposure to DBCP in humans results in moderate depression of the central
nervous system (CNS) and pulmonary congestion from inhalation, and
gastrointestinal distress and pulmonary edema from oral exposure. Chronic
(long-term) exposure to DBCP in humans causes male reproductive effects,
such as decreased sperm counts. Available human data on DBCP and cancer
are inadequate. High incidences of tumors of the nasal tract, tongue,
adrenal cortex, and lungs of rodents were reported in a National
Toxicology Program (NTP) inhalation study. EPA has classified DBCP as a
Group B2, probable human carcinogen.
Source: USEPA Air Toxics Website |
| EDB |
Manufacturer: |
| (Ethylene dibromide), 1,2-dibromoethane |
Introduced: 1945 |
- soil fumigant
- liquid formulation
- phytotoxic
- carcinogen
- registration cancelled 1970s
- Category I pesticide
|
| D-D |
Manufacturer: Shell |
| (D-D Mixture), 1,3-dichloropropene, 1,2-dichloropropane |
Introduced: 1943 |
- soil fumigant
- liquid formulation
- phytotoxic
- reformulated as 1,3-dichloropropene (Telone)
which reduced the volume of material tranported and applied
- Category I pesticide
|
|
|
Manufacturer: Poulenger USA, Inc. Lakeland,
Florida |
| (sesame seed oil containing
aldehyde, ketones and linolenic acids) |
?2002 |
- "For use on fine turf, golf courses, sports fields and lawns"
- Suggested application rates:
For light to moderate nematode
infestations, 2.5 to 3 gpa
For moderate to heavy nematode infestations, 3 to 5 gpa
|
|
|
Manufacturer:
- International Furan Technology,
- Durban, South Africa
-
-
Illovo Sugar Ltd., Durban, South Africa
|
| 2-furfuraldehyde, a derivative of pentose sugars |
?2001 |
-
Properties of Furfural
|
|
96.082 g/mole |
|
|
161.7 oC |
|
|
-36.5 oC |
|
|
1.1610 |
|
|
1.52608 |
|
|
1.494 cP |
|
|
59 oC |
|
|
315 oC |
|
|
8.3 g per 100 ml of water |
|
|
65% by weight of water
Boiling Point 97.85 oC |
|
|
400 mg/kg
127 mg/kg
541 mg/kg |
-
Discovered
by a German chemist, Döbereiner, 1820; first commercial production
in 1922.
-
Registered
as a nematicide in Spain and South Africa in 2001
-
An
oily liquid that smells of almonds
-
Flammability is similar to diesel.
-
It is a strong solvent
-
It is an aldehyde and chemically
reactive.
- Internationally rated as GRAS (GRAS: Generally
Regarded As Safe) when used as a flavor.
-
The very low volatility reduces the
toxicity risk.
-
It is metabolized rapidly and
excreted in the urine as furoylglycine.
-
Furfural is formed from pentosan, a five-carbon
cellulose which occurs in corncobs, bagasse, wood chips and other
organic material. The organic source
is heated to 100°C,
the pentosan
is hydrolysed to the soluble sugar pentose (xylose) and dissolves
in the available water.
Pentosan + n.Water
n.Pentose.
Dehydration of
pentose to furfural is by acid catalysis.
Acid
Pentose - 3 (Water)
+
3 Water
Heat Furfural
Reference:
International Furan Technology website
|
|
California Department of Pesticide Regulation
Davis, R.F., A.W. Johnson and R.D. Wauchope. 1993. Accelerated degradation of
fenamiphos and its metabolites in soil previously treated with fenamiphos.
Journal of Nematology 25:479-485.
Johnson, A.W. 1998. Degradation of fenamiphos in agricultural production
soil. Journal of Nematology 30:40-44.
McKenry
and Thomason
Rodriguez-Kabana, R. Nematicidal and herbicidal properties
of furfural-based biofumigants. Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology,
Auburn University,
Thomason, I. J. 1987. Challenges facing Nematology: environmental
risks with nematicides and the need for new approaches. In J.A. Veech and
D.W. Dickson (eds) Vistas on Nematology.
Trout, Tom. 2001. Fumigant use in California. USDA-ARS, Fresno,
California.